Trump intends to strip Harvard University of its tax-exempt status
Taking Aim at Harvard: The Potential Fallout if Trump Revokes Tax-Exempt Status
President Trump’s latest tweet storm has aimed his sights at Harvard University, threatening to revoke its tax-exempt status. As the tension between the administration and the Ivy League school escalates, it's crucial to examine the potential consequences of stripping universities of their tax-exempt status.
"We're gonna knock out Harvard's Tax Exempt Status. They deserve it!" Trump declared on his Truth Social platform.
This is not the first time Trump has hinted at this move. Following Harvard's lawsuit against the administration, he threatened, "Perhaps Harvard should lose its Tax Exempt Status and be Taxed as a Political Entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist-inspired/supporting 'Sickness?' Remember, Tax Exempt Status is contingent on acting in the PUBLIC INTEREST!"
However, Harvard spokesperson Jason Newton countered that the government has historically exempted universities from taxes to support their educational mission. He warned that revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status "would endanger our ability to carry out our educational mission," resulting in reduced financial aid for students, abandoned medical research programs, and lost opportunities for innovation.
Yet, one question remains: Is there legal ground for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status?
Uncharted Territory
Tax-exempt nonprofit groups, like 5001(c)(3) organizations, are prohibited from engaging in political activities per IRS guidelines. Violating these regulations could lead to the denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. However, it's unclear whether Trump's comments constitute such a violation.
The IRS would typically initiate an audit to gather evidence of noncompliance, but revoking a university's tax-exempt status is unprecedented territory. If proposed, the university could appeal through several courts, and should a review occur, it could have far-reaching implications for the future of higher education in America.
A Legal Minefield
Investigating the political motivations behind potential revocations would be a thorny issue. It's essential to distinguish between political preferences and violations of established public policy. Proving a clear, long-standing public policy violation would be key for any attempt to revoke tax-exempt status.
Moreover, there would be jurisdictional issues as the president lacks direct authority to revoke the tax-exempt status. Any changes would have to be made via IRS procedures, which involve audits and lengthy appeals processes.
Operational and Financial Consequences
If Harvard lost its tax-exempt status, the financial burden would be substantial. The university would need to pay corporate taxes on its income, potentially jeopardizing resources dedicated to scholarships, research, and innovation.
Operational changes would follow, with the university potentially operating as a taxable entity, reapplying for exempt status after making necessary changes, or transferring assets to another exempt organization.
At the heart of this issue lies the question of whether targeting universities for political disagreements is appropriate. As the situation unfolds, it's important to recognize the significant legal, financial, and operational implications involved.
- If Trump follows through on his threat to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status, the university could face increased financial burdens as it would need to pay corporate taxes on its income.
- The potential discontinuation of Harvard's tax-exempt status could lead to operational changes, with the university possibly reapplying for exempt status after making necessary changes or transferring assets to another exempt organization.
- The legal ground for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status is unclear, and investigating the political motivations behind such a move would be a complex issue, requiring a distinction between political preferences and violations of established public policy.
- Proving a clear, long-standing public policy violation would be essential for any attempt to revoke tax-exempt status, given that tax-exempt nonprofit groups are prohibited from engaging in political activities per IRS guidelines.
- The proposed revocation of Harvard’s tax-exempt status could have far-reaching implications for the future of higher education in America, as it remains unprecedented territory and could lead to legal challenges, lengthy appeals processes, and potential changes in how education-and-self-development institutions operate.


