Revision Techniques for Submitting Rejected Research Papers: A Detailed Strategy
In the world of academic research, manuscript rejection is a common occurrence, as thousands of researchers compete for publication in prestigious journals. However, this does not mean the end of the road for your work. By approaching the revision and resubmission process methodically and professionally, you can increase the likelihood of acceptance, whether submitting to the same journal or a different one.
When faced with a rejection, editors of journals such as the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS) may provide the option to revise and resubmit a manuscript, or they may suggest moving on to a new journal. In such cases, it is essential to understand the journal’s policy on resubmission. Some journals, like JACS, strongly discourage resubmissions of previously declined manuscripts unless under extraordinary circumstances. In such cases, authors must seek explicit permission from the Associate Editor who handled the original submission before resubmitting.
Thoroughly addressing reviewer and editor comments is crucial when preparing for a resubmission. Use the decision letter and reviewers’ critiques to guide revisions, making substantial improvements or clarifications that demonstrate clear new contributions or corrections. Superficial changes are unlikely to convince editors to reconsider.
When resubmitting, draft a point-by-point response to each critique, explaining how you addressed the issues or providing reasoned justification if certain suggestions were not implemented. This response letter should be polished, clearly written, and professional, emphasizing improvements and the significance of your work.
Before resubmitting, carefully follow all manuscript preparation requirements as outlined by the target journal. For example, the American Journal of Political Science requires concise abstracts, word counts, and adherence to ethics and replication policies.
Maintain professionalism and clarity throughout your revision and cover letter. Highlight changes in the manuscript using track changes, which can aid busy editors and reviewers in quickly scanning and checking revisions. Organize feedback into priority levels: major concerns, medium-level issues, and minor problems.
Any ethical or technical concerns, such as formatting, referencing, or citation errors, should be addressed to ensure compliance with ethical guidelines. Be prepared for possible reiteration during the review process and address additional revisions as needed to ensure acceptance for publication.
Feedback received should be analyzed and understood objectively to identify constructive suggestions for improvement. If a suggested change is not implemented, a well-justified explanation should be provided in the response letter.
Remember, a compelling cover letter should be included when resubmitting a revised manuscript, communicating the significance of the work, major revisions, and gratitude towards reviewers and journal editors.
Our platform Prime offers unlimited access to the platform Copilot, premium features like academic translation, paraphrasing, contextual synonyms, consistency checks, submission readiness, and more, for just US$19 a month.
For more information, related reads include "What Next After Manuscript Rejection? 5 Options for Researchers", "5 Reasons for Rejection After Peer Review", "How to Write a Conclusion for Research Papers (with Examples)", "7 Ways to Improve Your Academic Writing Process", and articles on academic writing, journal submission, manuscript rejection, manuscript submission, revise and resubmit, and tips for researchers.
- To improve manuscript submission readiness, consider utilizing tools such as academic translation, paraphrasing, and consistency checks, available on Prime's Copilot for just $19 a month.
- As you revise and resubmit your research paper, strive for consistency in writing style and structure for the sake of academic writing and personal growth.
- Paraphrasing and clear explanations can help you effectively address reviewer and editor comments during the resubmission process, ensuring the furtherance of your education-and-self-development.
- Maintain a professional tone throughout your submission, including when you conduct research, write papers, and interact with journal editors and reviewers for the sake of your personal-growth and academic advancement.
- The revised manuscript should showcase the significant contributions and improvements, emphasizing these aspects in the cover letter for a compelling presentation to the target journal.
