Skip to content

Is the Employment of ChatGPT for Academic Assignments Regarded as Academic Dishonesty in IB (2025 Honest AI Guide)

Exploring the possible ethical implications of using ChatGPT for International Baccalaureate (IB) assignments: Understand the IB's stance on AI usage, learn how to ethically employ AI tools, and recognize potential penalties for violating academic integrity regulations.

Using ChatGPT for school work and assignments in the IB program raises questions about academic...
Using ChatGPT for school work and assignments in the IB program raises questions about academic honesty in 2025.

Is the Employment of ChatGPT for Academic Assignments Regarded as Academic Dishonesty in IB (2025 Honest AI Guide)

The International Baccalaureate (IB) has issued guidelines on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in academic work, emphasising the importance of proper citation and ethical use.

One such AI tool, Jojo AI from RevisionDojo, is designed specifically for IB students. It generates flashcards from class notes, helping students study effectively without writing their assignments. However, it's crucial to remember that submitting work generated by any AI tool, including Jojo AI, without proper citation is considered academic misconduct.

ChatGPT, another popular AI tool, can be beneficial in explaining concepts, summarising articles, and generating flashcards or quiz questions for revision. It can also create outlines or brainstorm essay ideas. However, submitting AI-written essays, copying ChatGPT answers into school work, or using it to generate and submit lab reports or reflections is strictly prohibited by the IB.

The IB requires that any use of AI-generated content in student work be properly cited to avoid academic misconduct. In APA style, this involves including the URL of the chat, while in MLA style, the prompt and date should be included for transparency.

Moreover, the IB prohibits the use of any IB intellectual property to train or create AI tools or language models without written permission. This restriction applies to generative AI tools such as ChatGPT.

Schools often use Turnitin or plagiarism software to detect AI misuse. Teachers can also compare writing styles over time, notice gaps in understanding during oral assessments, and ask students to explain unfamiliar language or examples. In some cases, students may receive zero credit for the assignment if they use AI for writing.

It's essential to note that the IB does not punish students for using technology. However, submitting work you didn't write yourself crosses a clear ethical line. The key is to do the final work yourself and always cite any content generated by AI.

The IB has stated that ChatGPT and similar AI tools are not banned but should be used responsibly and ethically. This means critically evaluating AI output, transparently acknowledging its use, and ensuring that the work submitted is original and represents the student's understanding.

One area where AI tools are not allowed is the International Baccalaureate (IB) Internal Assessment (IA). Using ChatGPT for the IA is considered academic misconduct.

In conclusion, the IB encourages the responsible use of AI tools in academic work. Proper citation of AI-generated content and the ethical use of AI tools are key to maintaining academic integrity. Students are advised to use AI tools like Jojo AI and ChatGPT to support their learning, but the final work should always be their own.

In the realm of education-and-self-development, technology-driven learning tools, such as Jojo AI and ChatGPT, can generate flashcards and question banks for effective learning. However, it's imperative to properly cite any AI-generated content used in student work to maintain academic integrity and avoid academic misconduct as per the guidelines set by the International Baccalaureate (IB).

Read also:

    Latest